Head to head
GPT-4o vs GPT-5
GPT-4o (OpenAI) and GPT-5 (OpenAI) compared on intelligence, speed, context, and price — and which to choose. Both run on just4o.chat from one chat.
| Metric | GPT-4o | GPT-5 |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (AA index) | 17 | 45 ✓ |
| Output speed (tokens/sec) | 198.3 ✓ | 100.1 |
| Context window | 128K | 400K ✓ |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input price / 1M | $2.5 | $1.25 ✓ |
| Output price / 1M | $10 | $10 |
| Released | 2024-05-13 | 2025-08-07 |
Choose GPT-4o if you want…
- Faster output (~198.3 tokens/sec)
Choose GPT-5 if you want…
- Higher intelligence (Artificial Analysis index 45)
- Lower price ($3.44 / 1M blended)
- Larger context window (400K)
GPT-4o
Speed is GPT-4o's defining trait. Where comparable models average 61 tokens per second, GPT-4o delivers nearly 200 — and its native audio pipeline hits 320ms response latency, making it the practical choice for voice interfaces and real-time chat. It also collapses text, image, and audio processing into a single unified model rather than routing across separate systems, which produces more coherent multimodal reasoning without the awkward handoffs. Users feel this difference acutely. When OpenAI tried to retire GPT-4o in early 2026, the backlash was fierce enough to reverse the decision — petitions, mass unsubscribe threats, and user surveys suggesting 95% found no adequate replacement. That kind of loyalty comes from how the model feels in practice: snappy, versatile, fluent across 50+ languages, and capable of web search that reasoning-focused models like o1 lack. The honest caveat: GPT-4o trades raw reasoning depth for speed. It scores below average on Artificial Analysis's Intelligence Index and struggles with complex multi-step logic. For hard reasoning or large-document tasks, newer models outclass it. For fast, general-purpose, multimodal work, few match it.
Full GPT-4o details →GPT-5
GPT-5 is OpenAI's unified flagship — a single model that scales its reasoning effort up or down to match the task, rather than making you pick a separate variant. The result shows up most clearly in hard technical work: a perfect AIME 2025 score with tools, 74.9% on SWE-bench Verified, and a 1.6% error rate on medical benchmark HealthBench make it one of the more capable models available for code, math, and domain-specific research. Its 400,000-token context window handles large codebases and lengthy documents without truncation. Users consistently praise the step-up in accuracy and the meaningful reduction in hallucinations over GPT-4o. The honest caveat: GPT-5 trades warmth for precision. Early adopters widely noted that responses are shorter, cooler, and noticeably less conversational than its predecessor — a real shift if personality and back-and-forth rapport matter to your workflow. Latency is also substantial; extended reasoning produces a time-to-first-token around 68 seconds, which rules it out for anything requiring snappy replies.
Full GPT-5 details →FAQ
Which is better, GPT-4o or GPT-5?
GPT-5 leads on 3 of the headline metrics (higher intelligence (artificial analysis index 45); lower price ($3.44 / 1m blended); larger context window (400k)), while GPT-4o wins on faster output (~198.3 tokens/sec). The right pick depends on your priorities.
Is GPT-4o or GPT-5 cheaper?
GPT-5 is cheaper at $3.44 per 1M tokens (blended), versus $4.38.
Can I use both GPT-4o and GPT-5?
Yes. Both are available on just4o.chat from a single chat — you can switch between them per message with no separate subscriptions.