Head to head
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs GPT-5.1
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (Google) and GPT-5.1 (OpenAI) compared on intelligence, speed, context, and price — and which to choose. Both run on just4o.chat from one chat.
| Metric | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | GPT-5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (AA index) | 57 ✓ | 48 |
| Output speed (tokens/sec) | 132.6 | 142.7 ✓ |
| Context window | 1.0M ✓ | 400K |
| Max output | 66K | 128K ✓ |
| Input price / 1M | $2 | $1.25 ✓ |
| Output price / 1M | $12 | $10 ✓ |
| Released | 2026-02-19 | 2025-11 |
Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview if you want…
- Higher intelligence (Artificial Analysis index 57)
- Larger context window (1.0M)
Choose GPT-5.1 if you want…
- Faster output (~142.7 tokens/sec)
- Lower price ($3.44 / 1M blended)
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
At the top of the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index — ahead of every other model evaluated — Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview earns its ranking not just on raw ability but on the economics of getting there. It ran a full benchmark suite at less than half the cost of comparable frontier models, which makes it the clearest answer to the question of whether top-tier intelligence requires top-tier spend. A 38-percentage-point drop in hallucination rate over its predecessor and a 94.3% GPQA Diamond score in graduate-level scientific reasoning make it a serious tool for complex research, deep software engineering, and agentic workflows that need to get things right. Its 1-million-token context window handles entire codebases or lengthy document sets without batching. The honest caveat: time-to-first-token averages nearly 25 seconds, well above the median for comparable models, and some developers report extended waits or reliability issues under high API load. If your work is iterative and deep rather than real-time and conversational, the trade-off is usually worth it.
Full Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview details →GPT-5.1
GPT-5.1 earns its place through adaptive reasoning — a system that genuinely calibrates effort to the task, running roughly twice as fast on straightforward queries and digging deeper on complex ones. That mechanical intelligence shows up in the benchmarks: 94% on AIME 2025, 88.1% on GPQA Diamond, and a 76.3% solve rate on SWE-Bench Verified, making it one of the more capable off-the-shelf options for serious coding and research-level math. Users consistently praise how much cleaner the code output is — fewer logic errors, better edge-case handling — and the improved tool-calling reliability makes it a practical choice for production agentic pipelines. The catch is that the Auto-routing variant has frustrated users who found it silently redirecting requests through stricter safety filters without explanation, a criticism that turned OpenAI's own Reddit launch AMA into a notable PR setback. For teams willing to pick the right variant (Instant, Thinking, or Auto) and work within a September 2024 knowledge cutoff, GPT-5.1 offers strong price-to-capability value at $1.25 per million input tokens — cheaper than its GPT-5.2 successor while covering most production needs.
Full GPT-5.1 details →FAQ
Which is better, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or GPT-5.1?
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads on 2 of the headline metrics (higher intelligence (artificial analysis index 57); larger context window (1.0m)), while GPT-5.1 wins on faster output (~142.7 tokens/sec); lower price ($3.44 / 1m blended). The right pick depends on whether you prioritise capability, speed, or cost.
Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or GPT-5.1 cheaper?
GPT-5.1 is cheaper at $3.44 per 1M tokens (blended), versus $4.5.
Can I use both Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and GPT-5.1?
Yes. Both are available on just4o.chat from a single chat — you can switch between them per message with no separate subscriptions.