Head to head
DeepSeek V4 Pro vs GPT-5.1
DeepSeek V4 Pro (DeepSeek) and GPT-5.1 (OpenAI) compared on intelligence, speed, context, and price — and which to choose. Both run on just4o.chat from one chat.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Pro | GPT-5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (AA index) | 52 ✓ | 48 |
| Output speed (tokens/sec) | 79.8 | 142.7 ✓ |
| Context window | 1.0M ✓ | 400K |
| Max output | 384K ✓ | 128K |
| Input price / 1M | $1.74 | $1.25 ✓ |
| Output price / 1M | $3.48 ✓ | $10 |
| Released | 2026-04-24 | 2025-11 |
Choose DeepSeek V4 Pro if you want…
- Higher intelligence (Artificial Analysis index 52)
- Lower price ($2.17 / 1M blended)
- Larger context window (1.0M)
Choose GPT-5.1 if you want…
- Faster output (~142.7 tokens/sec)
DeepSeek V4 Pro
DeepSeek V4 Pro makes a compelling case that frontier-class coding performance and a one-million-token context window do not have to cost frontier-class money. At roughly $0.18 per million tokens blended, it runs 10x cheaper on input and 30x cheaper on output than comparable models, while posting an 80.6% score on SWE-Bench Verified — the highest reported among open-weight models at launch. Users consistently praise its agentic coding ability, noting it competes with or beats larger closed models on multi-step coding tasks, and its hybrid attention architecture handles full-codebase analysis without collapsing under the token budget. The MIT license is a genuine differentiator: weights are freely available for self-hosting, fine-tuning, and commercial integration. The honest caveat: V4 Pro is verbose. It can generate four to five times more output tokens than comparable models on the same prompt, which erodes the per-token savings and makes cost estimation harder than it first appears. Still in preview as of mid-2026, with all benchmark scores currently vendor-reported, it is best suited for teams comfortable with that tradeoff.
Full DeepSeek V4 Pro details →GPT-5.1
GPT-5.1 earns its place through adaptive reasoning — a system that genuinely calibrates effort to the task, running roughly twice as fast on straightforward queries and digging deeper on complex ones. That mechanical intelligence shows up in the benchmarks: 94% on AIME 2025, 88.1% on GPQA Diamond, and a 76.3% solve rate on SWE-Bench Verified, making it one of the more capable off-the-shelf options for serious coding and research-level math. Users consistently praise how much cleaner the code output is — fewer logic errors, better edge-case handling — and the improved tool-calling reliability makes it a practical choice for production agentic pipelines. The catch is that the Auto-routing variant has frustrated users who found it silently redirecting requests through stricter safety filters without explanation, a criticism that turned OpenAI's own Reddit launch AMA into a notable PR setback. For teams willing to pick the right variant (Instant, Thinking, or Auto) and work within a September 2024 knowledge cutoff, GPT-5.1 offers strong price-to-capability value at $1.25 per million input tokens — cheaper than its GPT-5.2 successor while covering most production needs.
Full GPT-5.1 details →FAQ
Which is better, DeepSeek V4 Pro or GPT-5.1?
DeepSeek V4 Pro leads on 3 of the headline metrics (higher intelligence (artificial analysis index 52); lower price ($2.17 / 1m blended); larger context window (1.0m)), while GPT-5.1 wins on faster output (~142.7 tokens/sec). The right pick depends on whether you prioritise capability, speed, or cost.
Is DeepSeek V4 Pro or GPT-5.1 cheaper?
DeepSeek V4 Pro is cheaper at $2.17 per 1M tokens (blended), versus $3.44.
Can I use both DeepSeek V4 Pro and GPT-5.1?
Yes. Both are available on just4o.chat from a single chat — you can switch between them per message with no separate subscriptions.